The Eleventh Sunday after Trinity

 The Eleventh Sunday after Trinity – August 31, 2025

Psalm 68; Genesis 4:1-15; 1 Corinthians 15:1-10

St. Luke 18:9-14

In the Name of the Father, and of the + Son, and of the Holy Spirit. Amen.

After being cast out of the garden, Adam knew his wife, Eve. She conceived and bore a son named Cain. She then bore another son named Abel. Cain was a worker of the fields, like his father, while Abel tended the flocks. One day, these two sons went to sacrifice to God but only the sacrifice of Abel was accepted by the Lord. On account of this, Cain’s face fell and he grew angry.

Our first question of the text should be, ‘why was Abel’s sacrifice accepted by God but not Cain’s?’ The Letter to the Hebrews gives us the definitive answer.[1] Abel offered his sacrifice in faith while Cain did not. This is the bottom line, the fundamental truth of the differences in their sacrifices.

At the same time, Scripture presents us with a few more details. Cain offered the fruit of the fields, likely a grain offering, while Abel offered a sacrifice of the firstborn of his flock. Both types of sacrifice, gain and the blood of animals, will later be instituted through Moses, but the greater of these sacrifices is the sacrifice of an animal. Again, the Letter to the Hebrews tells us that without the shedding of blood, there is no forgiveness of sins.[2] By this we know that the sacrifice of blood, the shedding of blood for the forgiveness of sins, is the greater sacrifice. Even Adam and Eve would’ve had this knowledge. When the Lord gave them the promise of a Savior, the Son of a virgin who would destroy death and the devil, He then sacrificed an animal and covered them with clothes of skin. By the shedding of blood, their nakedness was covered, their sins forgiven.

Our second question of this text should be, ‘why was Cain angry?’ If the difference was in the orientation of Cain’s heart, his lack of faith in the sacrifice, by what right is he angry with God? Even though we know that the sacrifice of blood is greater in the eyes of the Lord than the sacrifice of grain, both are acceptable sacrifices in the eyes of God. Therefore, Cain’s anger arises from his perception of an injustice committed by God. In Cain’s eyes, God is being unfair.

In this, we can sympathize with Cain. Our thoughts are not the Lord’s thoughts, and our ways are not His ways,[3] and all too often they seem unfair. We experience this in life when the wicked prosper but Christians suffer. We experience this in the words of Holy Scripture when the Lord rewards Abraham for pretending Sarah is his sister, or when He declares, “Jacob I have loved but Esau I have hated.”[4]

We know from the Scriptures that God cannot be unjust. Any injustice that man perceives in God is the result of a lack of understanding on man’s part, not a lack in God. He is the very definition of justice, righteousness, goodness, and love.[5]

Returning to Cain, the conflict arises not because Cain perceives an injustice in God but because he blames God for the injustice. Rather than seeking the Lord and His righteousness, Cain becomes embittered toward God. He begins to resent his Creator. Yet even in this state, we see the mercy of God. He comes to Cain and asks, “Why has your countenance fallen? If you do well, will you not be accepted? And if you do not do well, sin lies at the door. And its desire is for you, but you should rule over it.”[6]

The Lord is calling Cain to repentance and guiding him into the way of truth. It is as though God was saying, “Cain, what reason do you have to be angry? No, I did not accept your sacrifice today because it wasn’t offered in faith. Learn from this moment. Learn not to trust in the quality of your sacrifice, nor in your rank as firstborn, nor in the strength of your arm. Place your trust in Me, the One who is truly Good and from Whom all good things come. If your trust is in me and not your sacrifice, then your sacrifices will gladly be accepted. But if not, then satan is waiting to consume you. Your anger will overcome you, and it will be too late to stay your hand.”

But these words did not penetrate Cain’s stony heart. He had hardened himself against the Lord. He had set his mind on killing Abel. Now, generally, Cain’s plan to kill Abel is described as an act of envy. Cain was angry at Abel because Abel’s sacrifice was accepted by God. There is truth in this observation. Cain was almost certainly envious of the attention his brother received from God. But a closer read of the text reveals something even darker. If Cain’s anger is the result of a perceived injustice in God, then who is the primary object of his anger? Is it not God? It would follow that Cain’s murderous plan was not directed at Abel but at God. He wanted to destroy the object of God’s affection, hurting God for hurting him.

When God comes to Cain and asks where Abel is (another plea and opportunity for Cain to repent of what he has done), Cain says, “I don’t know. Am I my brother’s keeper?”[7] In effect, he is saying, “God, don’t you know where Abel is? Isn’t he your beloved son? Since you accepted his sacrifice, aren’t You supposed to be watching out for him?” Rather than repenting, Cain is doubling down on blaming God for the current situation. To Cain, it is God’s injustice that killed Abel.

Now, horrified as we are with Cain’s actions, and you should be, consider the times in your own life when you’ve acted as Cain and not as God. Both God and Cain think themselves justified in their actions but only One of them is right. God comes to Cain seeking the latter’s repentance and a restoration of their relationship. Cain doesn’t even respond to God in the first conversation and proceeds to hurt God by attacking the object of God’s affection. When the Lord again offers the opportunity for repentance, Cain does nothing but passive-aggressively attack the Lord. He shifts all blame onto God. For this, Cain is condemned and cast out of the presence of the Lord.

It is here we also see the connection to our Gospel text. The Pharisee loudly extols all of his righteous deeds to God and expects the Lord to reward him. The tax collector humbly begs for God’s mercy for he knows that he is a poor, miserable sinner. Both believe themselves righteous but only one returns to his home justified. One finds his justification in his righteous deeds. The other finds his justification in the mercy and atonement of the Lord. One believes his righteousness is a work of his own hands. The other finds righteousness in the shedding of the innocent blood of the Lamb of God.

According to our thoughts and our ways, the Pharisee is clearly the one who goes home justified. He has done all of the righteous things. He prays loudly so that all can hear and see his righteousness. According to our thoughts and our ways, it would be a great injustice for the Pharisee to be condemned.

Now the tax collector is a wicked man. He makes a living by cheating and stealing from his neighbors. Worse yet, from cheating and stealing from his kindred, from his fellow Judahites, to support the pagan government of Rome. Yet he comes into the Temple to humbly beg for the mercy of God, that God would make atonement for his grave sins and save him from eternal damnation.

The comparison to Cain and Abel is not to think of Cain as the Pharisee and Abel as the tax collector. Both the Pharisee and the tax collector are Cain. They are the two roads laid before Cain. The Pharisee is the sin lying at the door waiting to consume him. The tax collector is the repentance to which the Lord repeatedly calls Cain – both before and after the murder of Abel. “There are two ways, one of life and one of death, and there is a great difference between these two ways.”^[8]

Since the fall of our first parents, sin has been crouching at the door for every one of you. It is waiting for the opportune time to pounce upon your soul and drag you into the depths. But the Lord is patient. The Lord is kind. He has descended into the depths of your flesh to raise you from destruction. There is no depth of sin at which point Christ cannot reach you, no crevasse of the earth into which the blood of Christ, which speaks better things than that of Abel, is not able to cover your sin.

This does require humility. It requires humility not to trust in yourself or your own evaluation of your sins. Original sin has corrupted even your conscience. Alone, our conscience cannot be trusted to rightly discern between sin and righteousness. Our conscience must ever be formed by and checked against the Word of God. The renewal of your mind which comes with the indwelling of the Holy Spirit, will never be complete on this side of glory. It requires humility to submit yourself to the Word of God for His ways are not your ways and His thoughts are not your thoughts. It requires humility to trust that God is good, and He will provide for you the escape from your sins. In fact, He has provided the escape from your sins when He humbly submitted to the death of a criminal. In His goodness, He provides for the needy. He bears us up and is our salvation. Blessed be the Lord.

In + Jesus’ name. Amen.

---

[1] Hebrews 11:4.

[2] Hebrews 9:22.

[3] Isaiah 55:8.

[4] Malachi 1:2-3; Romans 9:13.

[5] Psalm 92:15; Deuteronomy 32:4; Romans 3:4.

[6] Genesis 4:6-7.

[7] Genesis 4:9.

[8] The Apostolic Fathers, “Didache 1:1,” 3^rd edition, translated and edited by Michael W. Holmes (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Academic, 2007), 345. 

Maundy Thursday

Maundy Thursday – April 6, 2023

Psalm 67; Exodus 24:3-11; 1 Corinthians 11:20-32

St. John 13:1-15, 34-35

In the Name of the Father, and of the + Son, and of the Holy Spirit. Amen.

The high priest Aaron had at least four sons whose names are recorded. The first two, presumably the oldest, are Nadab and Abihu. In the Old Testament reading for tonight, we heard how Aaron, Nadab, Abihu, and seventy elders of Israel went with Moses up the Mountain of the Lord. This happens just after Moses had received the Ten Commandments and the other judgments of the Lord.

Remember, at the time that Moses ascended the mountain, God had strictly forbidden anyone but Moses from even touching the mountain, lest he should die. All of Israel needed to be cleansed and purified for three days and even then, only Moses ascended the mountain of the Lord.

It seems that at some point, Moses came back down the mountain with a command to bring Aaron, Nadab, Abihu, and the seventy elders part-way up the mountain to worship the Lord. At this time, all of Israel swore to uphold whatever laws God commanded. Sacrifices were made and as Moses sprinkled the blood of the sacrifices on the people, he proclaimed, “This is the blood of the covenant which the Lord has made with you according to all these words.”[1]

Then Moses, Aaron, Nadab, Abihu, and the seventy elders went up the mountain and shared a meal with the Lord. God did not lay a hand on these children of Israel but dined with them. They saw God.[2]

After Moses returns to the top of the mountain; after the people cry out for Aaron to make them a god to worship; after Moses destroys the golden calf and makes the people drink it; after the Lord gives the Law to Moses a second time; the tabernacle is built and the priests are consecrated. Aaron and his sons are consecrated priests to serve in the House of the Lord.

For two of Aaron’s sons, Nadab and Abihu, this does not go well. Shortly after beginning their duties, Nadab and Abihu are said to each “take his censer and put fire in it, put incense on it, and offered profane fire before the Lord, which He had not commanded them. So fire went out from the Lord and devoured them, and they died before the Lord.”[3]

Nadab and Abihu were supposed to make the incense offering. They were supposed to use the special incense, prepared by Moses according to the direction of God, and put it on fire taken from the altar of the tabernacle, whose fire is never to go out. Now, they either used incense not created according to the will of God or they placed the incense of God on coals of a fire not taken from the Lord’s altar. Either way, they offered to God a sacrifice He had not commanded. They offered to God something unworthy of Him. They offered to God the filth of this world.

To our ears, the penalty seems far greater than the transgression. They screwed up the offering and God kills them for it. He burns them alive. But if we take a step back, suddenly God’s actions make, at least a little, more sense. The second half of the Book of Exodus, the Books of Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy mostly contain the Law of Moses. God gave this Law to Moses to answer a particularly difficult question: How does a sinful people come to dwell with a holy God? Or in the reverse: How does a Holy God dwell among a sinful people?

The Law of Moses is terribly specific. Some is for the governing of Israel but most of it is to answer this question. God had given to the people of Israel the means for Him to dwell with them. He revealed the entirety of His Law so that God and man could dwell together. What’s more, a careful reading of the Law will bring about the same conclusion we find in the Psalter by David’s hand,

For You, [O Lord,] do not desire sacrifice, or else I would give it;

You do not delight in burnt offering.

The sacrifices of God are a broken spirit,

A broken and contrite heart—

These, O God, You will not despise.

Do good in Your good pleasure to Zion;

Build the walls of Jerusalem.

Then You shall be pleased with the sacrifices of righteousness,

With burnt offering and whole burnt offering;

Then they shall offer bulls on Your altar.[4]

The blood of bulls and goats does not appease the wrath of God against man. Only the activity of God, doing good in His good pleasure among His people can soften the heart of man, turning it toward Himself. And then, only a broken and contrite heart is an appropriate sacrifice to God; a heart which knows its sin and grieves over the pain such sin causes the Lord. Such a sinner cries out to God for forgiveness and will not be put to shame.

Only then will God be pleased with the sacrifices of righteousness, with burnt offerings and whole burnt offerings. It is not as though the sacrifices of bulls and goats, of incense and grain, are indifferent to God. He has commanded them to Moses and the children of Israel. But the blood of a bull sacrificed with the black heart content to live in sin is not acceptable to the Lord. It is not a sacrifice of righteousness.

Taking the whole witness of Scripture, we see that Nadab and Abihu got exactly what they deserved. Not only did they offer a sacrifice not commanded by God but they offered it in their sin. They offered it according to either their sloth, their idolatry, their greed, or their pride. Whatever their motivation, it was not to the glory of God. If their offering to the Lord was not to His glory, then it is sin and sin is destroyed in the presence of a holy God.

Which brings us to the Lord’s Supper. Moses, Aaron, Nadab, Abihu, and the seventy elders went part way up the mountain to dine with the Lord. They saw God and shared a meal with Him. Yet the majority of this company would soon worship a golden calf and then at least two would commit such grievous sin that God saw fit to destroy them with fire.

The Lord chose to eat a meal with sinners. He called them up the mountain to dine with Him, knowing they are sinners. So too, our Lord Jesus Christ, called His apostles to a meal, His last meal, knowing they are sinners. One would betray Him. One would deny Him. Three would sleep when He commands them to watch. All would scatter.

In the upper room, just as the upper reaches of Sinai, God dined with His people, Himself being the way for sinful man to dwell with a Holy God. Just as Moses sprinkled the people with the blood of the sacrifice and said, “This is the blood of the covenant,” Jesus raised a cup and said, “This cup is the new covenant in My Blood.”[5] The blood of the bull pointed forward to the Blood of the eternal sacrifice of the Son of God. Just as the Lord told Israel, “This shall be an everlasting covenant for you and for your children,” so Jesus has said, “Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me.”[6]

This glorious meal of the Body and Blood of Jesus is given to you for the forgiveness of your sins. It is given to you so that you would be made one with God and that God might dwell with you. It is the most precious substance on earth, more precious than gold or silver, than technology or politics. It is the Holy Body and Precious Blood of God that you might dwell with Him forever.

If it is so precious, why then would we ever deny it to someone? Why keep it from young children or from those who are not members of our congregation or church body? St. Paul says, “For as often as you eat this bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until he comes. Whoever, therefore, eats this bread or drinks this cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty concerning the body and blood of the Lord.”[7] If the Lord showed Himself to take the offering of incense in the tabernacle seriously enough to slay Nadab and Abihu, what might He do to those receiving the Body and Blood of Christ in an unworthy manner? What does it mean to receive it in an unworthy manner?

The simple answer is faith. To be worthy to receive the Eucharist is to have faith in these words, “given and shed for you, for the forgiveness of sins.” But even an ape could be taught to recite these words. Faith is the certainty of something you cannot see.[8] Faith knows this is more than bread and wine, but it is the very Body and Blood of Christ, who died on the cross to satisfy the wrath of God. Faith knows this is not a symbol, nor strictly a matter of personal confession. St. Paul says, “As often as you eat this bread and drink the cup,” you make a public proclamation that you believe the same Jesus who died on the cross of Calvary is giving you His Body and Blood for the forgiveness of your sins.

Such a public proclamation can never be made in isolation. It is never just a statement of what you as an individual believes. Being a public proclamation, it is a statement of what the whole Christian Church believes. Sadly, there are divisions within God’s church. There are some who hold to unbiblical doctrines about the Lord’s Supper, about His death, about His nature. If you are communing at this altar, you are making a public proclamation that what is taught from this pulpit, what is confessed in this congregation, is the truth of Scripture.

And if you believe what is taught from this pulpit and confessed in this congregation but call yourself a member of the Methodist church, or a Baptist church, then your public confession is confused. You are saying one thing and believing something different. Scripture calls this hypocrisy. In this case, come speak to me and we can work toward bringing you into our congregation.

The same goes the other way. If you are a member of this congregation, believe what is preached from this pulpit and confess what we as a congregation believe, then you cannot commune at the Methodist, Baptist, Pentecostal, or Presbyterian church. To do so would be to commit hypocrisy in the other direction. You would be publicly saying you believe and confess what we believe and confess, but sharing in the table fellowship of those who believe differently.

What then of children? When St. Paul says, “Let a person examine himself,” what does he mean?[9] Does he mean every child must pass a written exam? Does he mean once you’ve graduated from confirmation class, your examination is complete? By no means! He means, let every man, woman, and child examine his conscience every time he desired to partake of the Lord’s Supper. Every time you desire to come into the presence of the Holy Body and Precious Blood of Jesus, you are to examine your conscience and find out if you are clinging to the profane fires of your sins rather than seeking the forgiveness of the filthy sins which cling to your flesh.

And so, if a child of seven knows the Ten Commandments, the Creed, and the Lord’s Prayer, knows what Baptism and the Lord’s Supper are, can confess she is a sinner who needs forgiveness, and that Jesus is the only source of that forgiveness, who is to say that she cannot commune? If all of that is true, St. Paul says she can commune.

Who makes the judgment based on her confession, if the child in question can accurately examine herself? “Let a man so consider us, as servants of Christ and stewards of the mysteries of God.”[10] In other words, consider your pastor as the servant of Christ and the steward of the Holy Sacraments. It is the solemn duty of the Office of the Holy Ministry to administer the Sacraments of God rightly. If they are mishandled; used wantonly; used for the glory of man; then the man in that office has a far worse fate than that of Nadab and Abihu to look forward to. If, however, he treats the mysteries of God as the Holy Things they are, then by his hand is distributed the forgiveness of sins, life, and salvation.

So then, as we enter into these most holy three days, let us do so with broken and contrite hearts. Let us enter into the Triduum examining our consciences, to see if we are clinging to our sin or if sin is clinging to us. Then, having faith that the Blood of Jesus was shed to fulfill all righteousness and has been given to you for the forgiveness of sins, let us come together as one in the Body of Christ and dine together on this mountain with our God.

In + Jesus’ name. Amen.

---

[1] Exodus 24:8.

[2] Exodus 24:11.

[3] Leviticus 10:1-2.

[4] Psalm 51:16-19.

[5] 1 Corinthians 11:25.

[6] 1 Corinthians 11:25.

[7] 1 Corinthians 11:26-27.

[8] Hebrews 11:1.

[9] 1 Corinthians 11:28.

[10] 1 Corinthians 4:1.